Last time we talked about writing good Abstract, Introduction, and Method sections. In this post, we synthesise the criteria of good Results and Discussion section.
By: Hao Ran Lai
1. Report findings only, do NOT discuss (that is for later)
2. A results section needs to be mostly text & narrative, using figures and tables to help readers make connections and to provide evidence for your statements. A results section should never just be a list of tables & figures with no or little connecting text. Continue reading
During the last lab meeting, each lab member read a scientific article and analysed the factors that contribute to good abstract and introduction.
Exchanging ideas and experiences in scientific writing. Photo: Hao Ran Lai.
1. Broad statement (1 sentence)
- Statement of broad field of research/context
- Introduces the ecological concept/problem
- What we know of the field
- Competing and unresolved explanations
2. Narrow down the problem (1 sentence)
- Significance to the problem
- Consequences of the problem
- What we’re going to do about it
- Brief description of an hypothesis that could resolve the problem
- Indicating the research gap Continue reading
During the last Buckley Lab meeting, we discussed some good pointers for giving good talks in preparation for the three honours students presenting their proposal talks in late April this year. Here are some our top tips!
- Prepare, prepare – know your content
- Most people can remember one or two things from a talk, decide up front what the most exciting thing you have to say is, put that in the title, then set the back ground for the exciting thing in the intro, why should the audience care about the thing. Does it answer a long standing question, does it have important real world consequences?
- Draw out an outline before making your presentation (e.g. as a flow diagram, where you plot out the transitions among components).
Kristylee Marr working on her honours proposal talk (source: N. Kerr)